Diesel Civil Trust

abbyjean:
GOOD’s executive compensation infographic shows the compensation levels of the business world’s top execs, with the number of minimum wage earners each super-suit’s take-home pay would support. (via boing)

abbyjean:

GOOD’s executive compensation infographic shows the compensation levels of the business world’s top execs, with the number of minimum wage earners each super-suit’s take-home pay would support. (via boing)

The Board’s interests in secrecy are, in fact, aligned with the banks’ interests and are contrary to the public interest. The Board wishes to continue to lend trillions of dollars of public money without oversight or accountability, and the banks wish to continue to reap the benefits of their access to public money without their depositors or shareholders – or the public at large – knowing anything about it…the public has a manifest interest in understanding and evaluating the government’s response to the recent economic crisis, in safeguarding its money, and in knowing whether its government is doling out its money to private entities imprudently.

Bloomberg Responds To Fed FOIA Appeal, Blasts Bernanke’s “Hyperbolic Speculation” Of Economic Collapse (via poortaste) (via ptbruiser)

AT&T NYC 3G lacks "penetration"

  • AT&T: Thank you for waiting Mr. Quirk. I do show that the tower that serves your area is currently on limited service which means that some users, not all, will not have service or be able to place and receive calls. I do show that repair teams working on the problem with no estimate to repair time. I apologize about any issues or inconvenience due to the outage.
  • AT&T: At this time, it appears that only the 3G service is affected. If you have a 2G device to use, it should work. Do you have a different phone to try and use for now?
  • Me: No. Can I switch my Blackberry Bold to 2G mode?
  • AT&T: I do not see where this is an option on the Bold. I apologize Mr. Quirk.
  • Me: will I be credited on my bill for this?
  • AT&T: No Mr. Quirk. I apologize for any inconvenience this might cause. Please contact AT&T Customer Service at 1-800-331-0500 for additional assistance with rate credits, plan changes, features changes, rollover minutes and billing inquires. Their hours of operation are Monday through Friday 7:00 am to 9:00 pm and Saturday 9:00 am to 6:00 pm and Closed Sunday. The after hours number is 1-866-801-3600.
  • Me: So I am paying for a service that AT&T is not providing
  • Me: that is illegal
  • Me: you can't charge someone for something and then not give it to them
  • AT&T: That is not correct Mr. Quirk.
  • Me: this has happened multiple times with ATT
  • AT&T: I will have to ask again for you to please contact Customer Service for any questions regarding this issue. Do you have any additional technical issues with your wireless device that I may assist you with today?
  • Me: Do you know why ATT has been problematic in my area the past year?
  • Me: I've been with ATT for 5 years now
  • Me: and the past year has been very bad
  • Me: service interruptions
  • Me: dropped calls
  • Me: congestion
  • Me: is it just too many people on the network?
  • AT&T: This can very well cause these types of issues Mr. Quirk. I apologize for any trouble you have experienced recently. 3G signal does not penetrate as far as the previous 2G network did. If you are in an area with lots of buildings and interference, this slight difference in signal strength may be what you are experiencing. 3G only provides faster data transmission speeds. The only phone that you can manually change from 2G to 3G, is the iPhone 3G.

some nasty examples of health care recission

abbyjean:

Woman Lost Her Home Because Coverage Was Canceled For Condition She Didn’t Have. “For Teresa Dietrich, it was fibroids. The Northern California real estate agent was left to pay $19,000 after Blue Cross said she did not disclose a diagnosis of the benign uterine tumors. But Dietrich said the doctor who had written ‘fibroids’ on her medical record never mentioned his suspicions to her. The bills destroyed her credit and cost her her home – and, in a comically cruel twist, the surgery proved the doctor was wrong. ‘They said I had a condition I didn’t even have,’ Dietrich said. ‘And they canceled me.’”

Woman Saddled With $25,000 Debt For Not Disclosing Condition She Didn’t Know She Had. “The untimely disappearance of Sally Marrari’s medical coverage goes a long way toward explaining why insurance companies are cast as the villain in the health-care reform drama. ‘They said I never mentioned I had a back problem,’ said Marrari, 52, whose coverage with Blue Cross was abruptly canceled in 2006 after a thyroid disorder, fluid in the heart and lupus were diagnosed. That left the Los Angeles woman with $25,000 in medical bills and the stigma of the company’s claim that she had committed fraud by not listing on a health questionnaire ‘preexisting conditions’ Marrari said she did not know she had.’”

Woman Denied Coverage For Gall Bladder Surgery Because Of Husband’s High Cholesterol. Washington Post: “In a pending case, Blue Shield searched in vain for an inconsistency in the health records of the wife of a dairy farmer after she filed a claim for emergency gallbladder surgery, according to attorneys for the family. Turning to her husband’s questionnaire, the company discovered he had not mentioned his high cholesterol and dropped them both. Blue Shield officials said they would not comment on a pending case.” (via thinkprogress)

abbyjean:

The untimely disappearance of Sally Marrari’s medical coverage goes a long way toward explaining why insurance companies are cast as the villain in the health-care reform drama. “They said I never mentioned I had a back problem,” said Marrari, 52, whose coverage with Blue Cross was abruptly canceled in 2006 after a thyroid disorder, fluid in the heart and lupus were diagnosed. That left the Los Angeles woman with $25,000 in medical bills and the stigma of the company’s claim that she had committed fraud by not listing on a health questionnaire “preexisting conditions” Marrari said she did not know she had.

By the time she filed a lawsuit in 2008, she also got a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and her debts had swelled beyond $200,000. She was able to see a specialist by trading office visits for work on the doctor’s 1969 Porsche at the garage she owns with her husband. “I’ve had about 10 visits,” Marrari said of the barter arrangement that has proved more reliable than her insurance. “The car needs a lot of work.”

Rescission — the technical term for canceling coverage on grounds that the company was misled — is often considered among the most offensive practices in an insurance industry that already suffers from a distinct lack of popularity among the American public. Tales of cancellations have fueled outrage among regulators, analysts, doctors and, not least, plaintiffs’ lawyers, who describe insurers as too eager to shed patients to widen profits.

Those sentiments have become central to the health-care debate, as President Obama tries to tap into dissatisfaction with the insurance industry to build support for reform efforts. Each of the bills pending in Congress would prevent insurers from rejecting clients because of preexisting conditions.

No one claims to know how often policies are canceled — in large part, congressional investigators say, because insurance companies are regulated by a patchwork of state laws and policies. But the practice is common enough to spur lawsuits and state regulatory action. In the past 18 months, California’s five largest insurers paid almost $19 million in fines for marooning policyholders who had fallen ill. That includes a $1 million fine against Health Net, which admitted offering bonuses to employees for finding reasons to cancel policies, according to company documents released in court.

When normal people happen to “find” their own money, it might mean a twenty left in a winter coat, or discovering change beneath the sofa cushions. But if you’re Charlie Rangel, it means doubling your net worth.

Earlier this month the Chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee “amended” his 2007 financial disclosure form—to the tune of more than a half-million dollars in previously unreported assets and income. That number may be as high as $780,000, because Congress’s ethics rules only require the Members to report their finances within broad ranges. This voyage of personal financial discovery brings Mr. Rangel’s net worth for 2007 to somewhere between $1.028 million and $2.495 million, while his previous statement came in at $516,015 and $1.316 million.

Previous: Older Posts >

Total: 1 of 6 Pages