This was sent to me by a friend stating “I’d love to see your take on this.” My take: any idiot on the internet can write about investing - I’m proof positive of that. There are benefits to the democratization of platform, and there are risks; most of the risks center around quality of information. In my view, this article contains low-quality information.
I’ll be attacking the article in three parts, one for each of its segments, highlighting its failure to consider the three central principals of investing.
Certificates of Deposit …There is virtually no risk involved and the only downside is you can’t make any withdrawals until the account matures, or else face early withdrawal penalties.
Let me start by re-iterating the core principal of investing:
The value of an investment decision is not the return received. The value of an investment decision is the return received relative to the risk assumed.
Everything has a risk. Think of it like this - let’s assume I have a job offer to file papers and I have a choice where I file them. I am offered $25,000 to file papers in an office building and $25,000 to file papers over an active volcano on a rope bridge. Those are extremely different risks to earn the same amount of cash. I’d be an idiot to do the volcano option, right? Making a good decision produces “alpha.”
So let’s begin to attack this article’s recommendation of CD’s with that ridiculous assertion that CD’s carry “virtually no” risk. Of course CD’s carry risks, and they’re larger than you think. Here’s a couple key risks:
1.) Liquidity risk. It’s equivalent to the withdrawal fee.
2.) Currency/inflation risk. The purchasing power of a CD denominated in USD floats relative to the supply of USD and the demand for USD in a variety of contexts. It changes every second relative to commodities, stocks, and other currencies.
3.) Interest rate risk. You take a withdrawal fee on your CD because banks know that interest rates change all the time. If I buy a 1-year CD in January at 1% and rates are at 5% in June, ouch.
4.) Default risk. Banks fail all the time - especially since 2008. Fortunately, almost all banks are FDIC members, so up to $100,000 your CD is insured (assuming you hold no other assets at the bank). Up to $100,000, your CD is not the risk of the bank - it’s the risk of the FDIC.
Note: This is where things get scary, where the government is blamed for some things, and where there is a difference between stated reality and actual banking industry mechanics.
What does the FDIC do? It bails out failing banking institutions, who don’t have enough liquid capital relative to their assets. One problem: the FDIC had nowhere close to the required capital to cover the national banking system’s insolvency exposed by the banking collapse in 2008. That’s why a $700B bailout package had to be created, and why a $500B Treasury line of credit was set up for the FDIC to draw on after it ran through its own pathetic $52B.
But the Treasury is empty - America has massive national debt and a current accounts deficit. So the FDIC is insuring all FDIC-insured CD’s up to $100,000 with - you guessed it - air. Well, not air. It’s actually insured by the “full faith and credit of the United States.” That means our super-duper AAA-rated Treasuries!
So unless your bank is safer than the US Government (hint: no), up until $100,000 your CD has the same default risk as a Treasury sold by the You-Nighted States of America. It’s denominated in the same currency as a CD. It has similar interest risk, too, because CD rates are implicitly related (simplifying, people) to Treasury rates. And buying/selling a Treasury is going to be cheaper than the withdrawal fee on a CD. So to determine if CD’s are a good idea (will generate alpha) up to $100,000, you need to compare the following investments:
- CD of size X over period Y held to maturity purchased effective Z.
- Treasury security of size X over period Y issued Z held to maturity.
Assuming you’re going to hold them to maturity, Treasuries offer you the ability to sell at any time (more liquidity), effectively the same risk, and (in all likelihood) a better rate than a CD. In this environment they are almost always a better investment, thanks to Sheila Bair and Tim Geithner.